Gleason Judd: Access and Lobbying in Legislatures

I study a model of legislative policymaking with interest groups. To lobby, groups must have access. Access provides opportunities to lobby particular legislators when they control the agenda. In equilibrium, persistent access creates a tradeoff. It changes legislature-wide expectations, thereby affecting which policies pass today. Thus, access to particular legislators can indirectly affect proposals by other legislators. These endogenous spillovers encourage access to some legislators but discourage access to others. Under broad conditions, groups forgo access to a range of more centrist legislators. In contrast, they are keen to access more extreme legislators. These results have implications for campaign finance and revolving door hiring. I also show that lobbying expenditures increase with several measures of legislature polarization. Expenditures can increase or decrease with access depending on the relative extremism of the group and targeted legislator.

Read the paper here: Access and Lobbying in Legislatures.

PE Students on the Market: Noam Reich (POL)

PE Students on the Market: Parth Parihar (ECO)

Zhao Li: How Internal Constraints Shape Interest Group Activities

Gleason Judd: Access and Lobbying in Legislatures

Mica Sviatschi: Making a Gangster

Germán Gieczewski: Policy Persistence and Drift in Organizations

Leeat Yariv: Affirmative Action in the Lab

PE Students on the Market: Ted Enamorado

Thomas Fujiwara: The Origins of Human Pro-Sociality

Subscribe to Blog